American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. (2021). TLVs® and BEIs®. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.
American Industrial Hygiene Association. (2005). 2005 Emergency response planning guidelines (ERPGs) and workplace environmental exposure levels (WEELs). Fairfax, VA: AIHA.
Craig, D. K., Davis, J. S., Hansen, D. J., Petrocchi, A. J., Powell, T. J., & Tuccinardi, T. E. (2000). Derivation of temporary emergency exposure limits (TEELs). Journal of Applied Toxicology, 20(1), 11-20.
Lipscomb, J. Standing Operating Procedures (SOP) for the Development of Provisional Advisory Levels (PALs) for Hazardous Chemicals. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-18/224, 2018.
National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Review of the U.S. Army's Health Risk Assessments for Oral Exposure to Six Chemical-Warfare Agents. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (1994). Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000). Standing operating procedures for developing acute exposure guideline levels for hazardous chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
State of California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Air Toxics Hot Spots Program. (March 1999). Risk Assessment Guidelines, Part I: Determination of Acute Reference Exposure Levels for Airborne Toxicants. CalEPA, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section.
CalEPA, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). (November 2019). OEHHA Acute, 8- hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Level (REL) Summary as of November 2019.
CalEPA, OEHHA. (June 2008). Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Technical Support Document for the Derivation of Noncancer Reference Exposure Levels.
CalEPA OEHHA. (2007). Assessment of Children’s Exposures to Surface Methamphetamine Residues in Former Clandestine Methamphetamine Labs, and Identification of a Risk-Based Cleanup Standard for Surface Methamphetamine Contamination. External Peer-review Draft, December. Integrated Risk Assessment Branch, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
CalEPA OEHHA, https://oehha.ca.gov/, (2/7/2021).
U.S. Department of the Army Public Health Command (2011). Chemical Agent Health-Based Standards and Guidelines Summary Table 2: Criteria for Water, Soil, Waste. PHN No: 0711-03.
U.S. Department of the Army Public Health Command (2013). Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel. TG230.
U.S. Department of Energy ORNL. (n.d.). Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs).
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2016) Health Consultation: An Exposure and Health Effects Health Consultation: An Exposure and Health Evaluation of Former Workers and Residents to Chemical Contamination at 1825 Glenbrook Road. Health Consultation.
U.S. EPA. Graphical Arrays of Chemical-Specific Health Effect Reference Values For Inhalation Exposures (2009 Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/061, 2009.
U.S. HHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (October 2020). Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) for Hazardous Substances.
U.S. HHS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2003). Final Recommendations for Protecting Human Health From Potential Adverse Effects of Exposure to Agents GA (Tabun), GB (Sarin), and VX. Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 196.
U.S. HHS CDC. Final recommendations for protecting human health from potential adverse effects of exposure to agents GA (tabun), GB (sarin), and VX. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR- 2003-10-09/03-25583. Fed Reg. 2003;68(196):58348-51. (7 February 2021).
U.S. HHS CDC. (2004). Interim Recommendations for Airborne Exposure Limits for Chemical Warfare Agents H and HD (Sulfur Mustard). Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 85. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/demil/files/Federal%20Register%20Mustard%20AEL%205_2004.pdf (1 December 2014).
U.S. HHS, CDC. Interim recommendations for airborne exposure limits for chemical warfare agents H and HD (sulfur mustard). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2004-05-03/04-9946. Fed Reg. 2004; 69(85):24164-8. (7 February 2021).
U.S. HHS, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), (CDC). (2013). Current Intelligence Bulletin 66: Derivation of Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) Values. Cincinnati, OH: US HHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2014–100. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2014-100/ (website) last accessed 12/1/2014. The actual published IDLH values can be found at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/intridl4.html, last accessed 12/1/2014.
U.S. HHS, NIOSH. (1994). Documentation for immediately dangerous to life or health concentrations (IDLH), NTIS Publication No. PB-94-195047. Washington, DC: NTIS.
U.S. HHS, NIOSH. (2004). NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Cincinnati, OH: DHHS (NIOSH).
U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (June 2005). Permissible Exposure Limits (website). OSHA. June 2005. Website titled Permissible Exposure Limits.
U.S. EPA (2018). 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. EPA 822-F-18-001. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/2018-drinking-water-standards-and-advisory-tables last accessed 2/5/2021.
U.S. EPA. (2008). IRIS Glossary of Terms. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/iris/iris-glossary (31 July 2008).
U.S. EPA. (2002). A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, EPA/630/P- 02/002F, 2002.
U.S. EPA. (1991). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals). EPA/540/R-92/003.
U.S. EPA. (2004) See Chapter 4 of the EPA Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment.
U.S. EPA. (1991). Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC. OSWER 9355.0-30.
U.S. EPA. (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks. Prepared by the Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPC) Committee of the World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group.
Watson A, Hall L, Raber E, et al. 2011a. “Developing health-based pre-planning clearance goals for airport remediation following chemical terrorist attack: introduction and key assessment considerations.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 17:2–56.
Watson A, Dolislager F, Hall L, et al. 2011b. “Developing health-based pre-planning clearance goals for airport remediation following a chemical terrorist attack: decision criteria for multipathway exposure routes.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 17:57–121.
Woodall, George M. Acute Health Exposure guidelines: Overview, Perspective, and Current Forecast of Needs. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 68:901-926, 2005.