alert - warning

This page has not been translated into Français. Visit the Français page for resources in that language.

References

Carlsen, T. et al. (September, 2005). Restoration Plan for Major International Airports After a Bioterrorist Attack, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, UCRL-TR-210178.

Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards, 6 C.F.R. § 27. (2007, April).

Environment Canada (2005). Report EE-176, Review of Decontamination and Restoration Technologies for Chemical, Biological, and Radiological/Nuclear Counter-terrorism, CRTI-IRTC.

Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, 29 C.F.R § 1910.120. (2020).

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1994). Advising the Public about Radiation Emergencies - a document for public comment: (Commentary no. 10).

National Research Council (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process.National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (1994). Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (2005). Review of the Department of Defense Research Program on low-level exposures to chemical warfare agents. National Academies Press. Washington, DC.

New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health Technical Working Group. (2004). “Gold Standard” for remediation of WTC contaminations. New Solutions. J. Environ. Occup. Health Pol. 14: 199-217.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Manual for Assessment of Chemicals. Paris, France.

Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2018). Aerosolization of Central Nervous System- Acting Chemicals for Law Enforcement Purposes. Review Conference. Fourth Session.

Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2019). Central Nervous System (CNS)-Acting Chemicals.

Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2020, June 7). Chemical Weapons Convention. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (1997). Final Report, Vol 1.

Shaw, J. (2006). Response to a chemical, radiological, nuclear or explosive WMD event. Annex C: principles of response to a radiation incident. Hartford, CT: The Capitol Region Metropolitan Medical Response System.

State of California, Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part III: Technical Support Document for the Determination of Noncancer Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Oakland, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section.

U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (2007). Medical Management of Chemical Casualties handbook. 4th ed. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Medical Research Institute of Defense.

U.S. Army, Marine Corps, Navy, & Air Force (2001). Multiservice Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Aspects of Consequence Management. FM3-11.21/MCRP 3-37.2C/NTTP 3-11.24/AFTTP (I) 3-2.37.

U.S. Army, Marine Corps, Navy, & Air Force (2016). Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Treatment of Chemical Warfare Agent Casualties and Conventional Military Chemical Injuries. ATP 4-02.85/MCRP 3-40A.1/NTRP 4-02.22/AFTTP(I) 3-2.69.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. Department of Health and Human Services.

U.S. Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2018, October). Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Environments. Appendix A: Chemical Hazard Considerations. Joint Publication 3-11.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2001). Managing Hazardous Material Incidents (MHMI). Volumes III. Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2016, November 3). National Toxicology Program: 14th Report on Carcinogens.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2017). National Incident Management System.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2019). National Response Framework.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (n.d.). About Risk Assessment. https://www.epa.gov/risk/about- risk-

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes. Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/P-02/002F, 2002.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks. Prepared by the Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPC) Committee of the World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008). Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Superfund Community Involvement Tools and Practices.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2018). Best Practices to Minimize Laboratory Resources for Waste Characterization During a Wide-Area Release of Chemical Warfare Agents Office.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2002). Approved Labeling for Antidote Treatment-Nerve Agent, Auto-injector.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2003). Rail Safety and Security: Some Actions Already Taken to Enhance Rail Security, but Risk-based Plan Needed. GAO-03-435.

U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2019, October). Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials.

World Health Organization (1978). Principles and methods for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals. Part I. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization (2004). Public health response to biological and chemical weapons: WHO guidance. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland.